up to sarah-marie belcastro's home page

Grading Grid for Presentation of Mathematics

area/points mathematics focus organization
3 Mathematics is correct, both conceptually and in the details; Mathematics presented makes sense; Defines unfamiliar terminology, notation; Clearly states assumptions and/or necessary conditions for formulas and theorems. Points out the difficult parts of the material; Probes beyond the surface material; Focus is on big concepts more than on rote skills; Discussion sets this portion of the material in context. Actively involves audience; There is evidence of effort in preparation; Speaks clearly and audibly; Clearly writes important points on the board/overhead; Pace is appropriate.
2 Occasional details incorrect; Some notation not explained; Unclear explanation(s). Concepts not presented clearly; Insufficient attention given to deeper aspects of content. Low interactivity or little evidence of preparation; Erases board too quickly.
1 Frequent conceptual errors; Some errors left uncorrected; Snarls in details; Explanations incoherent. Mainly rote computations; Basic definitions restated; Material presented in isolation. No interaction; No evidence of preparation; Incorrect or insufficient use of board/overhead; Pacing way off.

1 The tenth point is awarded for creativity/poise. It can take the form of humor or an unusual idea or solution or a beautiful handout, or...


up to sarah-marie belcastro's home page